Best AI Agent Frameworks in 2026: LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen, and More
Compare the top AI agent frameworks of 2026: LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, OpenAI Agents, and LlamaIndex. Includes framework selection guide.

Building AI agents has gone from a research curiosity to a practical engineering discipline. The frameworks enabling this shift have matured rapidly, each carving out distinct niches in the ecosystem. Whether you are building a simple chatbot with tool access or orchestrating a swarm of specialized agents tackling complex workflows, there is a framework designed for your use case.
Here is our guide to choosing the right one.
Framework Comparison
| Framework | Maintainer | Best For | Learning Curve | MCP Support | License |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LangChain | LangChain Inc. | Flexible, modular chains | Moderate | Yes | MIT |
| LangGraph | LangChain Inc. | Complex stateful workflows | Steep | Yes | MIT |
| CrewAI | CrewAI | Multi-agent role-based teams | Low | Yes | MIT |
| AutoGen | Microsoft | Conversational multi-agent | Moderate | Partial | MIT |
| Semantic Kernel | Microsoft | Enterprise / Azure integration | Moderate | Partial | MIT |
| OpenAI Agents SDK | OpenAI | Lightweight OpenAI-native agents | Low | Yes | MIT |
| LlamaIndex | LlamaIndex Inc. | Document-heavy RAG workflows | Moderate | Yes | MIT |
LangChain: The Flexible Foundation
LangChain remains the most widely adopted framework for building LLM-powered applications. Its modular architecture means you can mix and match components: swap out LLM providers, change vector stores, add tools, all without rewriting your core logic.
The framework has matured significantly since its early days of "chain everything together and hope for the best." LangChain Expression Language (LCEL) provides a clean, composable way to build pipelines, and the ecosystem of integrations is enormous. If a tool or service exists in the AI space, LangChain probably has an integration for it.
Choose LangChain when: You need maximum flexibility, want access to the broadest ecosystem of integrations, or are building modular applications where components may change over time.
Skip it when: You need low-level performance optimization or find the abstraction layers add unnecessary complexity for your simple use case.
LangGraph: Lowest Latency, Complex Workflows
LangGraph takes LangChain's foundation and adds proper graph-based orchestration. If LangChain is about building chains, LangGraph is about building state machines. Nodes represent processing steps, edges represent transitions, and you get fine-grained control over how your agent thinks, acts, and recovers from errors.
The key advantage is determinism and observability. You can define exactly which paths your agent can take, add human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and debug complex workflows by inspecting the graph state at any point. LangGraph also achieves the lowest latency among the major frameworks because of its efficient execution model.
Choose LangGraph when: You are building production-grade agents that need reliable, predictable behavior. Complex workflows with branching logic, error recovery, and human oversight are where LangGraph excels.
Skip it when: Your use case is straightforward. LangGraph's power comes with complexity, and simpler tools may serve you better for basic agent tasks.
CrewAI: Multi-Agent Made Simple
CrewAI takes a refreshingly intuitive approach to multi-agent systems. You define agents with roles, goals, and backstories, then organize them into crews that collaborate on tasks. It reads almost like writing a job description rather than programming an AI system.
The role-based design means you can create a "researcher" agent, a "writer" agent, and an "editor" agent, then let them collaborate on a content creation pipeline. Each agent brings its specialized perspective, and CrewAI handles the coordination.
MCP integration is first-class, meaning your agents can plug into a growing ecosystem of standardized tools without custom integration code.
Choose CrewAI when: You want multi-agent collaboration without drowning in infrastructure code. The mental model of roles and crews is intuitive and maps well to how human teams work.
Skip it when: You need fine-grained control over agent communication patterns or are building single-agent applications where the multi-agent overhead is unnecessary.
AutoGen: Conversational Multi-Agent
Microsoft's AutoGen framework models multi-agent systems as conversations. Agents talk to each other, debate, critique, and converge on solutions through dialogue. This conversational paradigm is particularly effective for tasks that benefit from multiple perspectives such as code review, analysis, and decision-making.
AutoGen's strength is in scenarios where you want agents to challenge each other. A "coder" agent writes code, a "reviewer" agent critiques it, and they iterate until both are satisfied. The results can be surprisingly robust.
Choose AutoGen when: Your problem benefits from adversarial or collaborative dialogue between specialized agents. Code generation with review, document analysis with fact-checking, and planning with critique are natural fits.
Skip it when: You need fast, streamlined execution. The conversational overhead means AutoGen agents take more tokens and time to reach conclusions.
Semantic Kernel: Enterprise Ready
Microsoft's Semantic Kernel is purpose-built for enterprise environments, particularly those already invested in Azure. It provides a clean plugin architecture, strong typing, and first-class support for C# and Java alongside Python.
The Azure AI integration is seamless: identity management, content safety filters, and enterprise compliance features come built-in. For organizations that need to satisfy security and compliance requirements, Semantic Kernel removes significant friction.
Choose Semantic Kernel when: You are building enterprise applications on Azure, need C# or Java support, or require robust security and compliance features out of the box.
Skip it when: You want maximum community support and ecosystem breadth, or you are building in a Python-first environment where LangChain has a stronger ecosystem.
OpenAI Agents SDK: Lightweight and Direct
OpenAI's Agents SDK (evolved from the earlier Swarm project) takes a minimalist approach. It provides just enough structure to build agents with tools, handoffs, and guardrails, without the heavy abstractions of larger frameworks. If you are already using OpenAI models and want to add agent capabilities with minimal overhead, this is the most direct path.
The SDK supports MCP natively, meaning you can connect to any MCP-compatible tool server with a few lines of code.
Choose OpenAI Agents SDK when: You are building lightweight agents on OpenAI models and want minimal framework overhead. Rapid prototyping and simple agent architectures are its sweet spot.
Skip it when: You need multi-model support, complex orchestration, or are building production systems that may need to switch LLM providers.
LlamaIndex: Document Intelligence
LlamaIndex has evolved from a pure RAG framework into a capable agent platform, but its core strength remains document-heavy workflows. If your agents need to ingest, understand, and reason over large document collections, LlamaIndex provides the most sophisticated indexing and retrieval infrastructure.
Choose LlamaIndex when: Your agents primarily work with documents, knowledge bases, or structured data. Legal research, financial analysis, and knowledge management are natural fits.
Framework Selection Guide
| Your Situation | Recommended Framework |
|---|---|
| Need maximum flexibility and integrations | LangChain |
| Building complex, production-grade workflows | LangGraph |
| Want intuitive multi-agent collaboration | CrewAI |
| Need agents that debate and refine outputs | AutoGen |
| Enterprise on Azure / need C# or Java | Semantic Kernel |
| Simple agents on OpenAI with minimal code | OpenAI Agents SDK |
| Document-heavy reasoning and RAG | LlamaIndex |
The MCP Factor
One trend unifying the framework landscape is the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Most major frameworks now support MCP, which means tools built for one framework can be used in another. This is reducing lock-in and making it easier to experiment with different frameworks without rebuilding your entire tool ecosystem.
Our advice: start with the framework that matches your mental model and team expertise. The "best" framework is the one your team can build and maintain effectively. And with MCP standardizing the tool layer, switching frameworks later has never been easier.