
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta's Llama 4 Maverick packs 400B total parameters into a 128-expert MoE architecture with only 17B active per token, beating GPT-4o on Chatbot Arena while matching DeepSeek V3 on reasoning at half the active parameters.
They summarize our coverage. We write it.
Newsletters like this one rebroadcast our headlines - often without the full review, the source reading, or the analysis underneath. Our weekly briefing sends the work they paraphrase, straight from the desk, before they get to it.
Free, weekly, no spam. One email every Tuesday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Meta's Llama 4 Maverick packs 400B total parameters into a 128-expert MoE architecture with only 17B active per token, beating GPT-4o on Chatbot Arena while matching DeepSeek V3 on reasoning at half the active parameters.

Meta's Llama 4 Scout is a 109B-total, 17B-active MoE model with 16 experts and a 10M-token context window - the longest of any open-weight model - with native multimodal support for text and images.

Mistral Large 3 is a 675B-parameter MoE model activating 41B per token with native multimodal support, a 256K context window, and Apache 2.0 licensing - Europe's first frontier-class open-weight model.

NVIDIA's hybrid Mamba2+MoE model packs 31.6B total parameters but activates only 3.2B per token, delivering frontier-class reasoning with 3.3x the throughput of comparable models on a single H200 GPU.

A benchmark-by-benchmark comparison of Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and DeepSeek V3.2 - the efficiency-optimized underdog versus the brute-force open-source heavyweight.

A data-driven comparison of Alibaba's Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Meta's Llama 4 Maverick - two open-weight MoE models with radically different approaches to parameter efficiency and benchmark performance.

A data-driven comparison of Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Mistral Large 3 - two Apache 2.0 MoE models where the smaller one dominates text benchmarks despite a 4x active parameter disadvantage.

Head-to-head comparison of Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and GLM-4.7-Flash - two Chinese-origin 30B-A3B MoE models with Apache 2.0/MIT licenses that dominate different benchmarks despite near-identical parameter budgets.

David vs Goliath: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B activates 3B parameters and beats Llama 4 Scout's 17B active on MMLU-Pro, GPQA, and coding benchmarks - but Scout's 10M context window and native multimodal support tell a different story.

A data-driven comparison of Alibaba's Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and NVIDIA's Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B - two ~30B MoE models activating ~3B parameters that take fundamentally different architectural approaches to the same problem.

MiniMax M2.5 is a 230B MoE model (10B active) that scores 80.2% on SWE-Bench Verified while costing 1/10th to 1/20th of frontier competitors like Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.2.

Alibaba releases four Qwen 3.5 medium models - Flash, 35B-A3B, 122B-A10B, and 27B - that match or beat the previous 235B flagship at a fraction of the compute. The 35B model activates just 3 billion parameters and still outperforms Qwen3-235B-A22B.