
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.4: Same Price, Different Wins
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.4 cost nearly the same per token but win on opposite benchmarks. Here is where each model leads and which to pick for your workload.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.4 cost nearly the same per token but win on opposite benchmarks. Here is where each model leads and which to pick for your workload.

Xiaomi's MiMo-V2-Pro is a 1-trillion-parameter MoE model with 42B active params, 1M context, and agentic coding performance that rivals Claude Sonnet 4.6 at a fraction of the cost.

Anthropic's mid-tier model matches Opus 4.6 on computer use, leads all models on office productivity tasks, and costs five times less than the flagship at $3/$15 per million tokens.

Kimi K2.5 leads every coding benchmark, but Qwen3.5-35B-A3B delivers 87-93% of that performance at 3-4x lower cost and runs on a single consumer GPU. Here is the full breakdown.

A pre-release comparison of DeepSeek V4 and Claude Opus 4.6 - the open-weight challenger that could match Opus on coding at potentially 89x lower output cost.

Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro more than doubles its predecessor's reasoning scores and introduces adjustable thinking modes, but latency issues and preview-status quirks keep it from a clean sweep.