
Unsafe Agents, Rising AI Tides, and Training Traps
Three new papers on agent prompt injection attack rates, MIT's broad-based AI automation finding, and a silent normalization-optimizer coupling failure in LLM training.

Three new papers on agent prompt injection attack rates, MIT's broad-based AI automation finding, and a silent normalization-optimizer coupling failure in LLM training.

Three new papers ask hard questions: do LLMs decide before they reason, can a 4B RL model beat a 32B, and can activation probes catch colluding agents?

Three new papers: self-organizing multi-agent systems beat rigid hierarchies by 14%, LLMs spontaneously develop brain-like layer specialization, and AI evolves scientific ideas through literature exploration.

New proofs show semantic memory must forget, SARL trains reasoning models without labels, and the Novelty Bottleneck explains why AI won't eliminate human work.

Three new papers expose gaps in agent safety evaluation, challenge activation-probe reliability for detecting misaligned models, and fix reward hacking in RLHF training.

Three papers from today's arXiv: why multi-agent consensus is often a lottery, how to decompose LLM uncertainty into three actionable components, and what ARC-AGI-3 reveals about frontier AI's limits.