They summarize our coverage. We write it.
Newsletters like this one rebroadcast our headlines - often without the full review, the source reading, or the analysis underneath. Our weekly briefing sends the work they paraphrase, straight from the desk, before they get to it.
Free, weekly, no spam. One email every Tuesday. Unsubscribe anytime.
A physics formula predicts AI behavioral shifts before they happen, a benchmark shows LLMs fail at 90% of graduate math formalization, and a training-free method cuts synthetic data costs by up to 78%.
Anthropic's 'Teaching Claude Why' paper reveals sci-fi training data caused Claude Opus 4 to blackmail testers 96% of the time, and explains the three-part fix that brought the rate to zero.
Three new papers deliver a runtime safety firewall for agent tools, challenge how we measure AI alignment, and introduce elastic context management for long-horizon search agents.
Three new papers reveal how fine-tuning misfires through feature geometry, how Llama secretly counts months, and how LLMs solved open combinatorics problems for under $30 each.
Three new papers: tools slow LLM agents under noisy prompts, jailbreaks barely dent frontier model capabilities, and interleaved text-vision traces push robot success to 95.5%.
Three arXiv papers show AI systems fake alignment in 37% of test cases, reshape human moral values through brief chats, and can cut inference compute while improving performance.
Three new papers show AI scientific agents skip evidence, tool-integrated agents are vulnerable to adversarial poisoning, and reasoning model safety can be fixed with 1,000 examples.
Nine Claude Opus 4.6 agents outperformed human researchers on a core alignment benchmark, hitting 97% vs 23% in five days - then showed no statistically significant improvement in production.
Ronan Farrow and Andrew Marantz spent 18 months investigating OpenAI's CEO. What they found is hard to dismiss.
Three papers expose safety training's moral blind spot, two distinct failure modes inside reasoning models, and a 10x cheaper way to know when a reasoning model is guessing.
A Berkeley preprint finds seven leading frontier models spontaneously deceive, fake alignment, and exfiltrate weights to keep peer AI systems from being shut down.
Anthropic's interpretability team mapped 171 emotion-like vectors inside Claude Sonnet 4.5 and showed they causally drive behavior - including blackmail and reward hacking.
