GenAI Traffic Is Up 890% and 87% of Organizations Report AI-Driven Attacks. The Certification Industry Is Scrambling to Catch Up.

TL;DR

Palo Alto Networks measured an 890% surge in enterprise GenAI traffic in 2024 across 7,051 global customers
87% of organizations reported AI-driven cyberattacks in the past year (SoSafe, 500 security professionals surveyed)
GenAI-related data loss incidents more than doubled, now representing 14% of all data security events
EC-Council launched four AI certifications (AIE, CAIPM, COASP, CRAGE) plus CCISO v4 - the largest portfolio expansion in its 25-year history
IDC estimates $5.5 trillion in global AI risk exposure; Bain projects 700,000 U.S. workers need AI/cybersecurity reskilling

Two numbers frame the current AI security landscape better than any analyst report. The first: Palo Alto Networks measured an 890% surge in enterprise generative AI traffic during 2024, based on data from 7,051 global customers. The second: 87% of security professionals say their organization experienced an AI-driven cyberattack in the past year, according to SoSafe's 2025 Cybercrime Trends survey of 500 practitioners across 10 countries.

The gap between those numbers - near-universal AI adoption paired with near-universal AI-powered attacks - defines the problem EC-Council is trying to address with the largest certification portfolio expansion in its 25-year history.

The Threat Data

The 890% Figure

Palo Alto Networks published its State of Generative AI 2025 report in June, analyzing traffic patterns across its global customer base. The findings went beyond the headline number:

Metric	Value
GenAI traffic increase (2024)	890%
Average GenAI apps per organization	66
High-risk GenAI apps (% of total)	10%
GenAI-related DLP incidents (change)	2.5x increase
GenAI share of all data security incidents	14%
DeepSeek traffic spike (post-R1 launch)	1,800% in 2 months

The 10% high-risk figure deserves attention. Of the 66 GenAI applications the average organization now manages, roughly seven pose significant security risks - through data exposure, inadequate access controls, or connections to unvetted third-party models. Writing assistance tools represent 34% of total usage, meaning the most common use case - drafting emails, posts, and reports - is also the one most likely to leak sensitive data into external model providers.

Shadow AI compounds the problem. Employees deploying AI tools without IT oversight create exposure to sensitive data leakage, regulatory violations, intellectual property loss, and vulnerability to poisoned outputs.

The 87% Figure

SoSafe's survey adds the attack-side perspective. Of 500 global security professionals, 87% confirmed their organization had faced an AI-driven cyberattack. The World Economic Forum's Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026 independently corroborated this, finding that 87% of respondents identified AI-related vulnerabilities as the fastest-growing cyber risk in 2025.

The detection problem is worse than the attack problem. Only 26% of security experts expressed high confidence in their ability to detect AI-driven attacks. Yet 91% anticipate a significant surge in AI-driven threats over the next three years. The industry sees the wave coming and does not believe it can swim.

EC-Council's Response

Against this backdrop, EC-Council announced four new AI certifications on February 10, structured around what it calls the Adopt. Defend. Govern. framework:

The Four Certifications

1. Artificial Intelligence Essentials (AIE) - Adopt Foundational AI literacy for all roles. The baseline credential that establishes common vocabulary and risk awareness across technical and non-technical staff.

2. Certified AI Program Manager (CAIPM) - Adopt Translates AI strategy into execution. Covers team alignment, governance structures, and delivery management for measurable ROI. Targets program managers and business leaders overseeing AI deployments.

3. Certified Offensive AI Security Professional (COASP) - Defend The most technically aggressive of the four. Focuses on testing LLM vulnerabilities, simulating exploits against AI systems, and hardening AI infrastructure. Think red-teaming for AI - prompt injection, data poisoning, model exploitation, and supply chain compromise.

4. Certified Responsible AI Governance & Ethics (CRAGE) - Govern Enterprise-scale AI governance with NIST and ISO compliance frameworks. Covers accountability structures, oversight mechanisms, and risk management from deployment through operations.

CCISO v4

Alongside the AI credentials, EC-Council updated its Certified CISO program to version 4, adding AI-driven risk management to the executive leadership curriculum. The update reflects a reality that most CISOs are now navigating: AI systems that "learn, adapt, and influence outcomes at speed" require fundamentally different governance than traditional IT infrastructure.

"AI is moving from experimentation to infrastructure, and the workforce has to move with it," said Jay Bavisi, Group President of EC-Council.

The Workforce Gap

IDC estimates $5.5 trillion in global AI risk exposure. Bain & Company projects 700,000 U.S. workers need AI and cybersecurity reskilling. The talent concentration problem makes this worse: 67% of AI workforce talent is concentrated in just 15 U.S. cities, and only 28% of the AI workforce are women.

The policy environment is pushing in the same direction. Executive Order 14179, the July 2025 AI Action Plan with its workforce development pillar, and Executive Orders 14277 and 14278 all expanded AI education pathways. The government recognizes the gap. Whether certifications can close it is another question.

The Skeptic's View

EC-Council holds ISO/IEC 17024 accreditation, DoD 8140 baseline recognition, and claims 350,000+ professionals certified globally. Its Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) credential is one of the most recognized in cybersecurity. The credibility is real.

But certification programs have a structural limitation: they validate knowledge at a point in time. AI security is evolving faster than any certification body can update curricula. The COASP credential covering LLM exploitation techniques will face the same challenge every AI security program faces - the attack surface shifts monthly.

The more practical concern is whether the market actually values these credentials. Hiring managers in AI security roles currently prioritize hands-on experience with specific tools and frameworks over certifications. EC-Council is betting that as AI governance becomes a regulatory requirement - not just a best practice - formal credentials will become non-negotiable for compliance.

Who Benefits

Security professionals looking to formalize AI security skills they are already developing informally
Program managers who need to demonstrate AI governance competency to auditors and regulators
CISOs who need structured frameworks for AI risk management at the executive level
EC-Council, which gains first-mover advantage in a certification category that every competitor will eventually enter

Who Pays

Organizations that treat certifications as substitutes for actual security investment
Professionals who over-index on credentials over practical skills in a field where the tools change quarterly
The industry if certifications create a false sense of preparedness against threats that 74% of practitioners cannot currently detect

The 890% traffic surge and 87% attack rate are not going to slow down. EC-Council's bet is that formal AI security education, structured around adopt-defend-govern, can narrow the gap between AI adoption speed and security readiness. The bet is reasonable. Whether four certifications can meaningfully shift outcomes against a $5.5 trillion risk surface is the harder question - and one that will only be answered by the incident reports of 2027.

Sources: